Post by Animatronic Daemon Skwerral on Jun 9, 2007 0:18:11 GMT -5
there are certainly parallels.
Both used used the idea of "preemption" to attack another country that had no clear ties to any actual threat to their countries. The difference here is that no one had the balls to stop the US. Only call us on our bullshit, but not back that call up with anything.
Both have done wonders in building a propaganda machine to silence critics, "With us or against us."
Both have imprisoned people without any trial or charges put against them. Gitmo
THe key difference is that no one within the Bush administration has ordered the execution of the people theyve detained on a mass scale.
I think it would be better to just call Bush a terrible person and president. Hitler has a too strong connotation to it.
Both used used the idea of "preemption" to attack another country that had no clear ties to any actual threat to their countries. The difference here is that no one had the balls to stop the US. Only call us on our bullshit, but not back that call up with anything.
Both have done wonders in building a propaganda machine to silence critics, "With us or against us."
Both have imprisoned people without any trial or charges put against them. Gitmo
THe key difference is that no one within the Bush administration has ordered the execution of the people theyve detained on a mass scale.
I think it would be better to just call Bush a terrible person and president. Hitler has a too strong connotation to it.
