Post by Padre Romero on Mar 1, 2007 14:35:28 GMT -5
I find it best to not accuse anyone of alt abuse, ever, unless I'm seeing 3-4 people with similar names in the same building...
it seems that whenever anyone gets away with anything good, people always cry foul with alt. abuse, which really ruins the victory of some rather good projects.
However, you're suggesting that 200 players each arm themselves with 25 alts...to take this to it's logical extent, would it be cheating if I armed 200 players with 50 Alts apiece and beat you that way? How about 100 players with 100 alts? How about 50 players with 200 alts? 50 players with 500? 25 players with 1000?, 10 players with 10000?
Obviously, motivating people to do this is impossible, but just think from a fairness perspective for a moment, does this sound fair?
not to meantion, each of your 200 players will need either an IP forger, a nearby computer lab, or a boatload of money at their disposal.
it seems that whenever anyone gets away with anything good, people always cry foul with alt. abuse, which really ruins the victory of some rather good projects.
However, you're suggesting that 200 players each arm themselves with 25 alts...to take this to it's logical extent, would it be cheating if I armed 200 players with 50 Alts apiece and beat you that way? How about 100 players with 100 alts? How about 50 players with 200 alts? 50 players with 500? 25 players with 1000?, 10 players with 10000?
Obviously, motivating people to do this is impossible, but just think from a fairness perspective for a moment, does this sound fair?
not to meantion, each of your 200 players will need either an IP forger, a nearby computer lab, or a boatload of money at their disposal.