Post by Animatronic Daemon Skwerral on Aug 10, 2007 3:41:52 GMT -5
Gotta love how anyone voting on keeping the article got their vote debated. I'm positive alot of you failed your civic classes junior year if you cant just let people vote without having to tell them theyre full of shit.
but anyway. the voice from Unreal Tournament just screamed HUMILIATION at this part
It is possible to write something with a POV.
I am FOR abortion, but i use facts at hand to deliver my thesis of aborting babies. therefore you must debunk the facts of something in there, not just say "NPOV!!!"
the thesis here is that the Bank isnt a black hole and it's possible for survivors to organize and take hold and have fun while doing it. The facts are presented clearly, and i challenge ANYONE to point out where we went wrong. Seeing as it was almost a year ago, any editing will just be done to make it more vanilla by people who probably weren't even there. So in a fact-debate, if i want to get petty, i could say cite your sources of your being there. I was there and have a lot of concrete proof of being there, and I agree to this being the truth.
Therefore if this going to be held in the regards of a real Wikipedia article then we should cite accounts and sources.
but anyway. the voice from Unreal Tournament just screamed HUMILIATION at this part
ironic, how someone arguing about a faux historical wiki page does not even know their real life history. people knew about the fethin' holocaust before the war ended. it was called the Final Solution and it was WELL ADVERTISED. just certain specificis were not widely known... well, anyway, sonny, you've just lost all credibility on the subject of "history" with your last comment... but i am true to my word and will not oppose the motion to have the article moved (see its talk page) ... but... oh the drama. the egos. drama. more ego. bigger drama. man, this game community is frigged up... --WanYao 07:43, 10 August 2007 (BST)
It is possible to write something with a POV.
I am FOR abortion, but i use facts at hand to deliver my thesis of aborting babies. therefore you must debunk the facts of something in there, not just say "NPOV!!!"
the thesis here is that the Bank isnt a black hole and it's possible for survivors to organize and take hold and have fun while doing it. The facts are presented clearly, and i challenge ANYONE to point out where we went wrong. Seeing as it was almost a year ago, any editing will just be done to make it more vanilla by people who probably weren't even there. So in a fact-debate, if i want to get petty, i could say cite your sources of your being there. I was there and have a lot of concrete proof of being there, and I agree to this being the truth.
Therefore if this going to be held in the regards of a real Wikipedia article then we should cite accounts and sources.
