|
|
Post by Sonny on Aug 10, 2007 20:22:12 GMT -5
A lot of people like it but a lot of people aren't fucktarded morons that know the difference between historical and humorous. I know, it is very confusing since both words start with the letter H. Ya see, we all know the event is historical. The page isn't. The page has nothing to do with the battle. It is a bad version of Anchorman. Let's see some great parts of the article showing how it follows the battle accuratley. Oh yes...pink vader...nazis dancing...Patton whailing on the guitar, awesome but not accurate...that fat fuck from Jurassic Park...enough Anchorman references to choke a horse... Yeah...it's humorous. Might I suggest other articles being put up for historical? wiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Battle_of_Walrond_Squarewiki.urbandead.com/index.php/Ridleybank_Reclamation_Forces
|
|