|
|
Post by Insomniac By Choice on Aug 11, 2007 16:24:49 GMT -5
I still think most of you are missing the point. It's not the article that's the problem, and almost no one wants to change Ron Burgandy's words. He's a smart guy and a good writer. The issue is that that's the article that has historical status. This is a game and it's not like this is supposed to be a history textbook, but that's what the wiki should aspire to when it records the official history of UD. Blackmore as an event is historical. The article as it is is a good article. But not a good historical article because it records one man's history and not what actually happened.
I don't really care because I wasn't there on either side, but as far as the principle of the thing goes, I'm definitely on the side of Jorm.
|
|