Post by blue tigers on Aug 11, 2007 21:48:28 GMT -5
jorm said:
And yeah: I still stand by "rewritten and corrected, removed and placed as part of a sub page, or deleted entirely." I don't see where I've backpedaled on that, but then again, I rarely see much intelligence from the people who seem to be saying I am. The *article in question* sets things up as "zombies versus survivors," mind you, so I'm not the one who started that.I don't care to change the page one iota. Leave it as it is; whatever you want. I just want the "historical" tag removed. That tag implies "official" and it's too POV to be official. I wasn't even at Blackmore; I honestly don't care much who won. I washed my hands of the RRF long before this occurred. But I think that if you really, truly step back and stop looking at it as "something written by someone in my group", you'll see that I'm right: it is far, far too POV to be given an "official" stamp.
I would also accept that the page be moved to Battle of Blackmore (Survivor Viewpoint), with Battle of Blackmore serving as a disambiguation page that pointed to that and Battle of Blackmore (Zombie Viewpoint) (to yet be created).
As an aside, I find it ironic that (to me) you appear to be taking this far, far more serious than I.--Jorm 06:49, 10 August 2007 (BST)
I would also accept that the page be moved to Battle of Blackmore (Survivor Viewpoint), with Battle of Blackmore serving as a disambiguation page that pointed to that and Battle of Blackmore (Zombie Viewpoint) (to yet be created).
As an aside, I find it ironic that (to me) you appear to be taking this far, far more serious than I.--Jorm 06:49, 10 August 2007 (BST)
Would you care to make up your mind?
Edit: grammar.