|
|
Post by blue tigers on Aug 12, 2007 8:33:48 GMT -5
Hello Jorm & Murray,
I believe that most of the ill feelings come from the way the current motion is formulated. Essentially the motion is ill-formed because it does not make a specific request, but rather proposes a very large range of options. Passing it would mean giving free reign to a number unspecified parties to do whatever they please, and I would hope you see how that is unacceptable. Moreover, I would expect that the final result would get again through voting, which makes the current voting superfluous.
My suggestion is to settle down on what your request really is. Once you have defined what is it that you desire, please make a motion with regard to replacing the current BoB with your improved version, be it the empty version if you so see fit. However, getting other interested parties involved in the new version might be a good idea, to avoid another voting blood bath.
I would also appreciate if you could make a classy move and retract the current motion, as being unnecessary and in need of a superceeding vote anyway. That would be a great move beyond words, showing an actual desire to move on.
Best regards, Blue Tigers
|
|