Post by bobsaturd on Aug 12, 2007 14:18:47 GMT -5
I also find it funny that a good portion of the votes are in the vein of "frustratin' dem damn zeds" . It seems as though alot of people are missing the issue. I agree it has gotten out of hand and some would say thats to be expected. I'm of the opinion that it should just be de-tagged as historical, and a new NPOV article should be written up. As it stands, the official article contains plenty of slanderous lies and half truths about a very real, and very active in-game group. Having such things not only hurts our reputation as a group, it also demeans the effort that alot of players, many of which aren't playing anymore and would be angered by such things in a historical article, put into fighting at Blackmore. I'm sure you wouldn't appreciate claims ( made out as fact) that Ghetto Cow used alts, zergs, and bots, especially since you ( and everyone else) know that its not true. I didn't fight at the first Blackmore, but then again I didn't cast my vote as a zombie veteran of the siege, or as someone looking to take away from the survivor glory that was holding that NT. I voted as someone who saw that such a slanted article should not be a historical recount of the event. Yea, it may be impossible to be completely unbiased, but we can come close.
Thanks! I picked up that hat when the RRF was fighting in Buttonville against the Randoms. They're a great group, with an awesome sense of humor, and I would highly recommend sending an alt their way.
Thanks! I picked up that hat when the RRF was fighting in Buttonville against the Randoms. They're a great group, with an awesome sense of humor, and I would highly recommend sending an alt their way.



