Post by Animatronic Daemon Skwerral on Sept 25, 2006 20:23:21 GMT -5
as Ron has said in RRF forums, they outnumbered us 3 to 1 and 4 to 1 and we held.
We are too focused on Blackmore. Blackmore was a battle and a rallying point like Thermopylae or Kursk, for a greater conquest, not the absolute reason for the invasion.
It is more than tactically sound to take the rest of the 'Bank than just having another 5 week camping campaign in blackmore. Blackmore is just ONE building of the 65 others that compose the Riddleybank suburb, which was the original goal of this incursion to Riddleybank. If we're going to win the Greater War of the Riddleybank we need to secure then entire Bank and show that we can hold more than one building.
We are too focused on Blackmore. Blackmore was a battle and a rallying point like Thermopylae or Kursk, for a greater conquest, not the absolute reason for the invasion.
It is more than tactically sound to take the rest of the 'Bank than just having another 5 week camping campaign in blackmore. Blackmore is just ONE building of the 65 others that compose the Riddleybank suburb, which was the original goal of this incursion to Riddleybank. If we're going to win the Greater War of the Riddleybank we need to secure then entire Bank and show that we can hold more than one building.
