Post by Animatronic Daemon Skwerral on Sept 26, 2006 15:56:13 GMT -5
Fangleader: The reason why I seek revives is straight-up AP efficiency. I can do more damage as a revived human than I can as a zombie, under certain circumstances. I'm not offended by being revived; I'm a dedicated zombie and use any and all means necessary to turn live bodies into not-live bodies. Being revived means I get to bypass the cades, and you all have to burn your hard-earned AP kicking me out. That's it.
I've got nothing against that. However, I don't think you are a dedicated zombie rather someone who is dedicated to the zombie cause. My issue with the RRF'ers is the hypocracy when they say they're the best zombie group in the game but are all too eager to go out of their way to use Death Culting. Also, I see it as a bad use of AP to stock up on weapons, then go
play zombie, and hope for a CR, when dedicated Death Culting, like what you do, will yield more direct results than leaving it open for the viarable of a CR (no matter how high).
I think you're partially right about the faction versus faction thing, but I haven't seen many unabashedly pro-survivor groups utilize zombies in their ranks. The sole exception is the rotter revive clinics, who use zombies to maintain the ransacks in their designated NT buildings to prevent griefer barricading.
The way I see it, a given group is either pro-survivor or anti-survivor. Pretty much all of your zombie groups are anti-survivor; they want Malton to be free of warm bodies. Then you've got the BBB, which is obviously pro-survivor; you all want warm bodies present.
The way I see it, a given group is either pro-survivor or anti-survivor. Pretty much all of your zombie groups are anti-survivor; they want Malton to be free of warm bodies. Then you've got the BBB, which is obviously pro-survivor; you all want warm bodies present.
Good way of broadening what I said, and it's absolutely correct. I was thinking of a non-zombie group like PH that will use zombies and humans to attack but this against survivors so yeah its Anti-Survivor Vs Pro-Survivor.
I think it's been empirically proven that undead members are virtually useless to most pro-survivor groups; the fact that the Blackmore Building, the only NT building in Ridleybank, is at the center of the Ridleybank campaign proves this. Without readily available syringes, you can't hold the suburb. And without an NT building, you can't get syringes. Think about it; are there any dedicated BBB members who are also dedicated zombies? Or does every Bastard dutifully proceed to the revive queue upon assuming room temperature?
You're the only Dedicated Zombie BBB member I see.
And what the hell are you talking about? I am an EXCELLENT revive candidate. 
I'll revive you the next time i'm at the revive point and only if you bow down on your knees and beg Saddam for his help and swear on the eyes of your children you will never attack Saddam.
There are so many things historically wrong with that statement I'm just going to weep.
what?Roman Empire they did rely heavily on alliances to fill in their ranks and try and make up for their diminishing strength of the roman legions moreso than earlier. Pagan Horde, i had hesitations about using that because Rome was technically Pagan yet Christism was on the rise, but I thought Germanic Tribes as the contributing factor to the fall of Rome, so thats how Pagan Horde was decided on.
