Post by Lord Wulfgar on Oct 25, 2006 17:42:52 GMT -5
dickholeguy said:
I respectfully disagree for two reasons1) ackland is clearly not stable if ron and others are biting it, and were not about to abandone our classy friends from AMS
2) Nichols is infestd right now, it would take about 50 of us to hold it. I say we let nature run its course there, the survivors are bound to retake it sooner or later
Ackland still has break ins, but they are easily repelled from what I've seen. We could always move alts. into Ackland to help hold it and send our mains on to Nichols.
And if we want Nichols back in time for the 5th, and I think we'll need it back, than we don't have time to let nature run its course. If we moved in the survivors in the area would rally to help I'm sure.
But this is all just my opinion, I'll follow where ever the main group decides to go for now.
