Post by blanemcc on Nov 3, 2007 4:16:15 GMT -5
BB2 is still messing with the SE.
BAr are planning our defences already for the NE. The SW was caught with its pants down and it appears BB2 has rarely met any resistance that could hinder it for long.
Once we've finalised our plans we're hoping to draw in refugees from the bash's march north.
If we can mass maybe 200-300 in an NT (not improbably, there's ome pretty big groups in the NE) then we can hold the bash for a bit and inspire a glorious battle.
As i said, we're still going over the details, but we're pretty much sticking to 3 lines of defence, 1 in Santlerville (an NT), 1 in Rolt Heights (The 'burch) and 1 in Dulston (Whitlock NT).
Would you guys be willing to head on over if it meant saving the NE from a nasty beating?
Thanks
-Blanemcc
Ed: oh yeah, forgot to mention, in order for the bash to head for our defences instead of outflanking us and attacking behind our designated line of defence, some of us will have to bait them on barhah dot com to head for our desired 'burb to defend.
BAr are planning our defences already for the NE. The SW was caught with its pants down and it appears BB2 has rarely met any resistance that could hinder it for long.
Once we've finalised our plans we're hoping to draw in refugees from the bash's march north.
If we can mass maybe 200-300 in an NT (not improbably, there's ome pretty big groups in the NE) then we can hold the bash for a bit and inspire a glorious battle.
As i said, we're still going over the details, but we're pretty much sticking to 3 lines of defence, 1 in Santlerville (an NT), 1 in Rolt Heights (The 'burch) and 1 in Dulston (Whitlock NT).
Would you guys be willing to head on over if it meant saving the NE from a nasty beating?
Thanks
-Blanemcc
Ed: oh yeah, forgot to mention, in order for the bash to head for our defences instead of outflanking us and attacking behind our designated line of defence, some of us will have to bait them on barhah dot com to head for our desired 'burb to defend.
