|
|
Post by Murray Jay Suskind on Aug 10, 2007 16:38:56 GMT -5
One would hope it would take more than the defense of Stickling to piss Jorm off.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lachryma on Aug 10, 2007 16:45:05 GMT -5
Somebody was talking about going back to Moggridge in that thread, and I was saying that would be a bad idea with all this Blackmoar drama...
So yeah, that thread was talking about some random things.
|
|
|
|
Post by Angel on Aug 10, 2007 17:13:43 GMT -5
Even though we were supposed to be talking about Stickling. I have a bad habit of getting everyone off topic.  |
|
|
|
Post by Redwave on Aug 10, 2007 17:34:22 GMT -5
I was proposing we go to Moggridge in jest, the joke being we couldn't even if we wanted to. Not with 90% of the NMC being undead at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Post by Angel on Aug 10, 2007 17:58:05 GMT -5
Shhh, can't you see I'm trying to take the blame? |
|
jorm
Junior Member
Radical Barhah Fundamentalist
Posts: 62
|
Post by jorm on Aug 10, 2007 18:26:35 GMT -5
Ha ha, that's in Stickling Defense thread, not this one! It didn't get deleted! D'oh! My bad. I have no idea how that got there; I don't even read that thread. |
|
|
|
Post by Angel on Aug 10, 2007 18:29:31 GMT -5
I was wondering why you put it there... I thought it was you using your super secret zmob!e mind control powers to confuse us.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sonny on Aug 10, 2007 18:44:22 GMT -5
For those that are against the removal.
We're not deleting the page. We're only unlocking it so that we can make it...you know...historical.
|
|
|
|
Post by bobsaturd on Aug 10, 2007 18:47:07 GMT -5
Indeed. That seems to be where the misunderstanding lies.
|
|
|
|
Post by Magatsu Taito on Aug 10, 2007 18:49:55 GMT -5
Those that are against deleting it doesn't want it to be changed, so in their minds it would be as bad as deleting it, why the thing isn't moved is anyones guess... Or why the title isn't changed, or a disclaimer added for that matter...
|
|
|
|
Post by Angel on Aug 10, 2007 18:51:49 GMT -5
Actually, Hagnat added a POV type disclaimer to it. Happy now? If you want, I could undertake writing a zombie themed one, with a little help of course...
|
|
|
|
Post by Sonny on Aug 10, 2007 19:32:31 GMT -5
We don't want a zombie themed one.
We want an article that describes the battle. This one doesn't. It has nothing to do with the battle at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Wulfgar on Aug 10, 2007 19:59:16 GMT -5
That article describes the battle just fine, even if it is given a very, very survivor themed flare. I should know, I was there for all of it.
That article should not be changed in the least, I'd rather have it moved and let the damn zeds win there little fight then have the words of Mr. Burgundy changed in anyway.
|
|
Vecusum
Full Member
Though I am not naturally honest, I am so sometimes by chance.
Posts: 205
|
Post by Vecusum on Aug 10, 2007 20:03:27 GMT -5
Editing the article doesn't mean removing Ron's version, it means making the version that is marked historical neutral and then moving Ron's version to a C4NT subpage, that has been stated many times.
|
|
|
|
Post by Angel on Aug 10, 2007 20:04:22 GMT -5
Ah, but others say differently. I understand it perfectly, but others do not. I ownder how many people have 40 Karma?
|
|
