|
|
CoL
Jul 21, 2007 7:48:53 GMT -5
Post by swiper on Jul 21, 2007 7:48:53 GMT -5
After absence and hearing about new CoL...
Whats the lowdown/how do I apply...
|
|
|
|
CoL
Jul 21, 2007 9:31:55 GMT -5
Post by Sonny on Jul 21, 2007 9:31:55 GMT -5
I'm bringing it back actually.
To become a Councilor you need to be a leader of a survivor group.
|
|
|
|
CoL
Jul 21, 2007 17:09:56 GMT -5
Post by swiper on Jul 21, 2007 17:09:56 GMT -5
Does overseer/technical leaderpostition apply?
Thanks to my unique status in the ACC? Despite Saul commands ops etc
|
|
|
|
CoL
Jul 21, 2007 20:59:39 GMT -5
Post by Sonny on Jul 21, 2007 20:59:39 GMT -5
Do you still lead ACC? If not then I can't allow you to run for Councilor. But General is still an open position that will be filled by Councilors when they vote.
|
|
|
|
CoL
Jul 22, 2007 7:48:35 GMT -5
Post by swiper on Jul 22, 2007 7:48:35 GMT -5
I can call missions as such but I'm on the back burner.
OOh...may stand for General then if I couldnt apply as councilor...
|
|
|
|
CoL
Jul 22, 2007 19:25:31 GMT -5
Post by Sonny on Jul 22, 2007 19:25:31 GMT -5
I know a lot of people are looking for General. If you can somehow prove you're in some way a leader or co-leader (as in the Beavers case who have a few leaders with equal power) I can allow your nomination.
|
|
|
|
CoL
Jul 24, 2007 8:08:33 GMT -5
Post by swiper on Jul 24, 2007 8:08:33 GMT -5
My full position is 'Strategic Advisor' which is essentially a joint 2nd in command position with traits and aspects of leading it again...
So I'd qualify?
|
|
|
|
CoL
Jul 24, 2007 8:47:17 GMT -5
Post by asshole doctor™ on Jul 24, 2007 8:47:17 GMT -5
hey sonny where would i fall into? i'm on the leadership board of two groups.
|
|
|
|
CoL
Jul 24, 2007 16:05:26 GMT -5
Post by Sonny on Jul 24, 2007 16:05:26 GMT -5
You are leader of Mossad, which counts as its own group. So you could run. Just apply now.
And Swiper, go for it. I can't prove you're not a leader so you'll have to prove you are.
|
|
|
|
CoL
Jul 24, 2007 16:07:11 GMT -5
Post by asshole doctor™ on Jul 24, 2007 16:07:11 GMT -5
well someone nominate me. all tho I think padre would be the best choice. as he is sorta head of the NMC while ron is off binge drinking.
and i think I'd rather be a viceroy or warlord.
technically mossad is a sub group of the rangers.
but i really consider john, cavek, and I to be equal leaders of the rangers.
although mossad does have alot of "outside contractors" so I guess it might be a separate group even tho we never show numbers because mossad shouldn't ever be put in ones in game group tag.
and whats akules fucking problem now?
|
|
|
|
CoL
Jul 26, 2007 9:27:35 GMT -5
Post by Sonny on Jul 26, 2007 9:27:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
CoL
Jul 26, 2007 9:32:51 GMT -5
Post by vigeous on Jul 26, 2007 9:32:51 GMT -5
Sonny, I have a question: What about Mercenary groups? The RHA, is in truth, a mercenary group. It's no my fault 85% of our contracts are hits. I know I wouldn't get anyway near elected (Hell, i'm suprised that Masque is up there, but he is right.) |
|
|
|
CoL
Jul 26, 2007 9:34:09 GMT -5
Post by asshole doctor™ on Jul 26, 2007 9:34:09 GMT -5
too lazy to to that.
anyway I'm too much of a misanthrop to be on the COL. i'd rather just be a warlord.
|
|
|
|
CoL
Jul 26, 2007 9:43:27 GMT -5
Post by Sonny on Jul 26, 2007 9:43:27 GMT -5
RHA would not be allowed at all. The difference with the Philosophe Knights is that they kill people that are destabilizing Malton, kind of like a modern day Darth Revan, for anyone that played KOTOR.
And I can't nominate them so...someone's gotta
|
|
|
|
CoL
Jul 26, 2007 9:45:16 GMT -5
Post by vigeous on Jul 26, 2007 9:45:16 GMT -5
RHA would not be allowed at all. The difference with the Philosophe Knights is that they kill people that are destabilizing Malton, kind of like a modern day Darth Revan, for anyone that played KOTOR. And I can't nominate them so...someone's gotta Aw, damn. Oh well. |
|
