|
|
Post by Vito The Don on Jan 5, 2007 15:11:10 GMT -5
well i tried to take over the gingerbread
then found out that they were still a group(just barley) so i joined them
|
|
|
|
Post by Prisonner Of Today on Jan 5, 2007 17:04:06 GMT -5
Oh yay, another month old thread brought back to life for no reason. Oooo, and it's an announcement too!
|
|
|
|
Post by ian on Jan 6, 2007 12:18:23 GMT -5
i wonder why
we should leave the 'NMC wiki needs updating topic' up there, just too keep grippys name around
|
|
|
|
Post by Prisonner Of Today on Jan 6, 2007 17:08:43 GMT -5
Eh, if you want my honest opinion, Dick now does just about as good of a job as Grippy did. He's just a bit more arrogant and not as good of a diplomat.
Just preserve the "Look what I found" thread alive, it's the link yo the old rangers board.
|
|
|
|
Post by ian on Jan 7, 2007 13:48:10 GMT -5
DHG is better with the troops than grippy (hence the huge number of rangers) but less so with the planning and diplomacy
and im nowhere near as good at planning and diplomacy as grippy was either but ive got to try or at least stop this bastard headache
|
|
|
|
Post by Prisonner Of Today on Jan 7, 2007 17:52:53 GMT -5
Well, the rangers are becoming alot more diplomatic in their leadership, so having one fixed diplomat doesnt really matter anymore. It's numbers that count. For that, he does a great job.
One thing I think we could do without is the constant charging off to different places. Pick a place, stick with it till the work is done, then charge off. But that's just what I see happening.
|
|
|
|
Post by Leon Silverblood on Jan 7, 2007 23:45:16 GMT -5
maybe something to do with our fearless leader's short attention span?
|
|
|
|
Post by Prisonner Of Today on Jan 7, 2007 23:49:15 GMT -5
That's what I'm thinking...
|
|
|
|
Post by Leon Silverblood on Jan 8, 2007 4:41:58 GMT -5
You know what I think would really make a difference?
If the entire NMC came down on our largest enemy with a nomadic attack effort, just dogging the hell out of them, killing, killing, and re-killing until they flee, and then following them and killing some more. It would boost harman morale and possibly devastate the RRF. Or rejuvenate it, you never can tell with these things.
I'll put up a thread with the plan in clandestine once I have it better thought out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vito The Don on Jan 8, 2007 5:31:36 GMT -5
no
|
|
|
|
Post by Prisonner Of Today on Jan 8, 2007 6:17:26 GMT -5
Good thought, never happening.
|
|
|
|
Post by ian on Jan 8, 2007 8:15:02 GMT -5
moving the NMC as a whole is a bit difficult so we tend to scavenge about half each group to go to a battle which makes decent enough numbers
and the rangers should at be nomadic, mostly as suburbs get boring if you stay in them for too long
|
|
|
|
Post by Die Hard Girlyman on Jan 8, 2007 12:37:36 GMT -5
yeah. My attention span is shot but I'm working on it. The problem with eastonwood is they literally zerg and cheat to no end. We Can't win unless we sink to their level, and I don't want to sink to that level.
|
|
|
|
Post by asshole doctor™ on Jan 8, 2007 13:20:24 GMT -5
just keep drawing ferals away from ciager.
|
|
|
|
Post by ian on Jan 8, 2007 14:35:00 GMT -5
we can win, gimme till tomorow to think about it but ill find a way
|
|
